PDA

View Full Version : Lawsuit to Be Filed Over New Voting Law in Georgia


lawyerlee
09-06-2005, 01:55 PM
Lawsuit to Be Filed Over New Voting Law in Georgia (http://www.nytimes.com/2005/09/06/national/06georgia.html?pagewanted=print)
New York Times

By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS

ATLANTA, Sept. 5 (AP) - Opponents of a new Georgia law requiring voters to show photo identification at the polls are planning a federal lawsuit challenging the measure, which they fear will lower voter turnout.

The bill eliminates the use of formerly accepted forms of voter identification like Social Security cards, birth certificates or utility bills.

A news conference to discuss the lawsuit was set for Tuesday, said State Representative Tyrone L. Brooks Sr., Democrat of Atlanta.

The suit is likely to echo the complaints that several groups filed in objection letters sent to the Department of Justice before it approved the new law last month.

Under the Voting Rights Act, Georgia and other states with a history of suppressing minority voting must get federal permission to change their voting laws.

Mr. Brooks said he believed the issue could ultimately be decided by the United States Supreme Court. "No matter who wins at the lower court level, there will be appeals," he said.

The Republican-backed measure caused racial tension during the state's legislative session last spring. Most of Georgia's black lawmakers walked out at the Capitol when it was approved.

Democrats had argued that the idea was a political move by the Republican Party to depress voting among minorities, the elderly and the poor, all traditional bases for Democrats.

Plaintiffs in the suit include the Coalition for the People's Agenda, whose chairman is the Rev. Joseph Lowery; the Georgia Association of Black Elected Officials; the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People; and the Southern Christian Leadership Conference. The American Civil Liberties Union is representing the plaintiffs in the case.

The groups plan to include Georgia voters as co-plaintiffs, especially those who would be "grossly affected by the proposal," Mr. Brooks said.

Several other states request photo identification, according to the National Conference of State Legislatures. Most allow voters without photo ID to use other forms of identification or sign an affidavit of identity.

Atlanta_eBride
09-06-2005, 08:16 PM
I'm completely for this voting law as I hope it will ease the tensions/problems when dealing with voter fraud. I really don't see why showing ID is such an issue as I have to show ID for a ton of things and it's the law - don't hear people complaining about having to show it for cigarettes or alcohol around here.

A identification card contains the same personal information, photo, signature and special protection against alteration and fraud as a driver license. The cost of the Identification Card is $20.00 for 5 years or $35 for a card valid 10 years.

I just really don't see the issue.

KarenS
09-07-2005, 12:12 AM
I have to agree with Laura. I really don't see why this is such a big deal. Voting fraud is a big deal and with the last few elections it's been a huge problem. An ID card in GA is very inexpensive and you don't have to provide any more information than you'd have to provide to the election officials anyway. So with a photo ID it proves that you're actually you voting.

I'm not sure why this one is a problem - even for those with reduced income or minorities. If someone can explain it to me, I'd certainly be willing to listen.

Karen

lawyerlee
09-07-2005, 01:26 AM
I think there is a valid argument for requiring ID, but voting certainly isn't comparable to purchasing beer or cigarettes. Voting is a fundemental right, while the other pracitices are limited privileges.

Precedent does not seem to favor upholding this law, but anything, as always, could happen. :)

Atlanta_eBride
09-07-2005, 07:45 AM
I think there is a valid argument for requiring ID, but voting certainly isn't comparable to purchasing beer or cigarettes.

Wouldn't it be comparble since you still have to be "of age" to vote just like there is for those types of purchases?

This will be interesting to watch for sure. ;)

lawyerlee
09-07-2005, 09:41 AM
Wouldn't it be comparble since you still have to be "of age" to vote just like there is for those types of purchases?
No, because there is a constitutional component to voting that just doesn't exist with the other two examples. :)