PDA

View Full Version : "The Historian" by Elizabeth Kostova


sublime311
08-25-2005, 10:18 PM
Wondering if anyone has read this and if so, would you recommend the book?

Here is a description I found from Borders:

"To you, perceptive reader, I bequeath my history . . . "

Late one night, exploring her father's library, a young woman finds an ancient book and a cache of yellowing letters. The letters are all addressed to "My dear and unfortunate successor," and they plunge her into a world she never dreamed of -- a labyrinth where the secrets of her father's past and her mother's mysterious fate connect to an inconceivable evil hidden in the depths of history.

The letters provide links to one of the darkest powers that humanity has ever known -- and to a centuries-long quest to find the source of that darkness and wipe it out. It is a quest for the truth about Vlad the Impaler, the medieval ruler whose barbarous reign formed the basis of the legend of Dracula. Generations of historians have risked their reputations, their sanity, and even their lives to learn the truth about Vlad the Impaler and Dracula. Now one young woman must decide whether to take up this quest herself -- to follow her father in a hunt that nearly brought him to ruin years ago, when he was a vibrant young scholar and her mother was still alive.

What does the legend of Vlad the Impaler have to do with the modern world? Is it possible that the Dracula of myth truly existed -- and that he has lived on, century after century, pursuing his own unknowable ends? The answers to these questions cross time and borders, as first the father and then the daughter search for clues, from dusty Ivy League libraries to Istanbul, Budapest, and the depths of Eastern Europe. In city after city, in monasteries and archives, in letters and in secret conversations, the horrible truth emerges about Vlad the Impaler's dark reign -- and about a time-defying pact that may have kept his awful work alive down through the ages. Parsing obscure signs and hidden texts, reading codes worked into the fabric of medieval monastic traditions -- and evading the unknown adversaries who will go to any lengths to conceal and protect Vlad's ancient powers -- one woman comes ever closer to the secret of her own past and a confrontation with the very definition of evil. Elizabeth Kostova's debut novel is an adventure of monumental proportions, a relentless tale that blends fact and fantasy, history and the present, with an assurance that is almost unbearably suspenseful -- and utterly unforgettable.

Sounds good!

Amaye
08-29-2005, 09:40 AM
I haven't read it but I just bought it on Saturday. I can't wait to get started - it sounds like a book l would like.

Heather719
08-29-2005, 03:16 PM
Another one who bought it but hasn't read it yet- I'd love to see what those who have read it think.

isobel
09-03-2005, 01:36 PM
I read it last month and while I definitely enjoyed it, I was not as enthralled as expected. Some of this has to do with the structure of her writing. She jumps back and forth in time and does not always delineate well. I will be interested to see what you think.

doradora
09-03-2005, 04:25 PM
I read this book a couple of month ago too, and agree that I did enjoy it too, though also not as much as all the glowing reviews made me think I would. It took me a while to get into the plot and I have to admit sometimes I was bored by all the historical descriptions. Still, a fun summer read!

SierraStar
11-13-2005, 11:49 PM
Has anyone read The Historian by Elizabeth Kostova?
I just finished it and I thought it was a great book.
I was entertained and I enjoyed the descriptions of the different locales.
I think she did an amazing job on her research.
I enjoy books that combine history & suspense.
Even though it was long, 656 pages, I didn't get bored.

Jennifer
11-21-2005, 08:42 PM
Glad to hear you enjoyed it! I've got it sitting on my shelf to read as soon as I get a little downtime (It's a bit big to be toting around too much!) - looks intriguing!

houseblend
11-28-2005, 08:35 PM
It's next on my list, too! I have it sitting on my nightstand even. Glad to hear you liked it!

jnettie
09-15-2006, 06:36 PM
I just finished it, oh, five minutes ago!

I really liked it. I didn't seem to have a problem following the timeline, jumping back and forth, but I can see how others might be annoyed by it. There was just one chunk I thought totally unnecesssary - that whole Chronicle of Zacharia thing - but otherwise I really enjoyed it. I'm itching to talk about it, and since DH hasn't read it yet....

Rosebud
09-18-2006, 11:35 AM
I read it earlier this year and really liked it. And this isn't normally a genre I'd read...I don't like horror or vampire novels much. Yes, the book is LONG, but I never got bored with it. It is really atmospheric and I found the historical aspects to be very interesting. I also thought the author did a good job of not indulging vampire cliches and placing Vlad Dracula in a historical context. It seemed smarter than your average vampire tale, to me. I'd recommend it!

jnettie
09-18-2006, 11:45 AM
Oh, I agree, Rosebud03! I liked the history and how she avoided too many cliches. I'd compair it to "Mists of Avalon" in a way. Reading carefully is important, because things come up later that were only discussed breifly 150 pages before! :p

magrat
09-19-2006, 07:50 PM
It was different from the usual vampire tales, but in a way that made it almost harder for me to suspend my disbelief. It was trying so hard to make it seem historical that the fantasy aspects were harder to swallow.

jnettie
09-22-2006, 01:56 PM
I don't know, the reality of Vlad the Impaler is rather gruesome...more so than Dracula tales ever are. I felt like it supported the folklore very well.

pocket
09-22-2006, 02:37 PM
I liked it, but I didn't love it.

pride&prejudice
09-29-2006, 07:31 AM
I'm so glad to hear that people liked this book. I have it, but was very histant about whether I would like it. I'm hit or miss with liking vampire based books.

jnettie
09-29-2006, 11:34 AM
I'm generally not a vampire book person, but this one I liked. I thought is was more like a mystery with vampires.

BeakersTrio
10-01-2006, 02:47 PM
I'm not a vampire book person either, but I liked it too. I actually read it in about 5 days because I only had a one week loan on it from the library and wasn't able to renew it.

For me, I think the appeal of this book was that it was loosely based on fact. While some parts were hard for me to get into, overall, I truly enjoyed it.

betsyboop
10-03-2006, 07:35 AM
I read it a few months ago and thought it was just ok, a little dull maybe. But I bought it off the bargain rack at the book store, so I wasn't expecting much though;)

Jennifer
10-03-2006, 09:20 PM
Like many pp's I'm not usually a big fan of vampire genre books (ie I'll read 'em but don't seek them out - or even like them when I do read them...)...but I thought this was really interesting and engaging. I looked at it as "historical fiction" more than a vampire book.

I'm thinking this is a book I'll re-read (I pretty much re-read anything I "liked"...it's my test about which books are keepers!)

chefker
06-29-2007, 11:13 AM
Just finished it. It was a decent read, not as good as the hype led me to believe. It was well written, but that "Chronicle of Zacharias" part was complete filler, IMO.

It's probably unfair to compare this book to Bram Stoker or Anne Rice, but to me, those are the best examples of vampire lore.